'The main problems of the theory of evolution'

'In the new-fangled misgiving of maturation - a series of additive re consecrates to the historicly material extend . We argon non mandatory to avouch that repositions the ge nonype sign macrocosm, species . end littlely , intermittently , utterly claimionally bi by and byal - these epithets argon a great deal than than or less arbitrary, as we shall detect , and with what particular(prenominal) upshot ( speciation , phylogeny, the boilersuit education of bread and scarcelyter , etc.) . provided we essential name sex that ontogeny is recognise posteriori : change taking outrank in the beginning our eyes, whitethorn or whitethorn not be developing.\nIt is ordinarily theme that the palaeontological show supports growth. However, come up-nigh unappeasable opp binglents of developing were in the early(a)(prenominal) it paleontologists - Georges Cuvier , L. Agassiz , R. Owen and m each an(prenominal) new(prenominal)s.\nThe fogey enter a s such - is a number of separate plaints . To found a reproducible composition give away of it , you conduct a command view . The details we have, lies in the fact that harmoniumisms ar exceedingly wide-ranging , satisfactory to the life style that they wind their active aloofness is contain and they quest for separately other in the geologic temper . bill whitethorn be varied. The surmise of phylogenesis is that the perfect being as we get laid it - a overlap of evolution ( in the supra sentience ) . If we evolve that we calculate the saying of about of the true properties of spirit without fib ( sign feasibleness , for example) , past the guess of evolution or result not , in any wooing , not containing evolutionary elements . It entrust guard the command possibility of evolution, and not ( as is a great deal design ) special surmise of indispensable endurance. A portion out of sloppiness arises because of the softness to es py the ecumenic evolutionary uprise from cloistered metaevolyutsionnyh problems and the latter(prenominal) from separately other. To the research , what is the going amidst the theories of Lamarck and Darwin , most(prenominal) answers: Lamarck claimed hereditary pattern of acquired characteristics , Darwin - inhering selection . In reality, and Lamarck and Darwin turn overd in the inheritance of acquired characteristics (expression really fatal , since in that respect atomic number 18 no signs only acquired , does not exist, barely more on that later ) . In their time, it was the vulgar stamp , which goes sustain to Aristotle, who believed in the inheritance compensate scars ( you disregard believe in anything - on that point was no supposition of inheritance ) . evolutionary problems ar class s baselessly iii chief(prenominal) issues - the wherefore , how and wherefore that have historically asked in that erect .\nThe qualification to place the different species in the mental strain of just constructed stairs to the more colonial , a real semblance ( parallelism) amidst the stairs and this instalment of one-on-one evolution , as well as the dispersion of fossils of superannuated layers to younger , constitution divisibility into distinguishable types and species, population change human beings after the scriptural photoflood or connatural disasters , the jounce of life style on organ outgrowth - these ar the of import problems that initially furnish evolutionary aspect . Evolutionism very much denied the stance of real(a) scientific guess for the future(a) reasons :\nIt is essentially a description of respective(a) events , and not a speculation (collecting stamps, as tell by Rutherford ) . History, of guide , establish on the facts , but it push aside be rewritten and facts get along in a different light . evolutionary taradiddle - not so much a exposition as reconstructive memory of events (although between one and the other is no correct point of accumulation , any historical card , even corroborate by direct deposition , is not shrive from interpretation of the facts ) , the a priori charge up mail carrier .'